O.S. v. E.S.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 27, 2015

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 2015-02-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2015

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte O.S., 205 So.3d 1233 (Ala.2014). On remand to this Court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we hereby reverse the judgment of [the trial court] and remand the cause for the entry of a judgment of the [trial court] dismissing [the wife’s] action against [the grandparents] for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.””

quoted by 1 later decision, including O.S. v. E.S.

Relies on O.S. v. E.S.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-02-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

¶2The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte O.S., 205 So.3d 1233 (Ala.2014). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we hereby reverse the judgment of the Walker Circuit Court and remand the cause for the entry of a judgment dismissing E.S.’s action against O.S, and J.A.S. for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction,

¶3 *1245REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and THOMAS, • MOORE, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.