Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 SO3D 1270 - Bonds v. State

Bonds v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 614 So. 2d 405 - Ex Parte Jackson · 855 So. 2d 513 - Bean Dredging v. Alabama Dept. of Revenue · State v. Union Tank Car Company · Republic Steel Corporation v. Horn · Ex Parte Shelby Cty. Health Care Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Words used in a statute must be given their natural, plain, ordinary, and commonly understood meaning, and where plain language is used a court is bound to interpret that language to mean exactly what it says. If the language of the statute is unambiguous, then there is no room for judicial construction and the clearly expressed intent of the legislature must be given effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[a] person commits the crime of a school employee engaging in a sex act or deviant sexual intercourse with a student under the age of 19 years if he or she is a school employee and engages in a sex act or deviant sexual intercourse with a student.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “For purposes of this article, school employee includes a teacher....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.