Bybee v. State

Decided October 23, 1918

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1918-10-23

<p>Criminal Law <&wkey;1097(6) — Statement oe Pacts — Necessity.</p> <p>A motion for new trial, claiming that the verdict is contrary to law and evidence, cannot be considered, in absence of a statement of the facts; the indictment being in the usual form.</p>

Affirmed · Decided 1918-10-23

DAVIDSON, P. J.

¶1This conviction was for a violation of the local option law. Appellant’s motion for new trial is based upon the ground that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence. The record is before us without, a statement of the facts.. The indictment seems to be in the usual form. Without the testimony we cannot review the questions raised in the motion for new trial

¶2The judgment is affirmed. .

¶3(&wkey;>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numhered Digests and Indexes