Crews v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1969
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kyhl v. Commonwealth · Lutz v. City of Richmond
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Only a physician, registered professional nurse or graduate laboratory technician, using some type of a cleanser or sterilizer for the instruments used and for the part of the body from which the blood is taken, other than alcohol or other substance which might in any way affect the accuracy of the test, shall withdraw blood for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content therein.” 49 Va. L. Rev. 398 -399.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Díaz Just
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.