Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 205 W. Va. 139 - Becton v. Hun

205 W. Va. 139 - Becton v. Hun’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Morrison · Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health · Vazquez v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare · 157 W. Va. 640 - State v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing ‘counsel’s performance, courts, must apply an objective standard and determine whether, in light of all the circumstances, the identified acts or omissions were outside, the broad range of professionally competent assistance while at the same time refraining from engaging in hindsight or second-guessing of trial counsel’s strategic decisions. Thus, a reviewing court asks whether a reasonable lawyer would have acted, under the circumstances, as defense counsel acted in the case at issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.