State v. Dean’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
42
cited by 42 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Chimel v. California · Chambers v. Maroney · New York v. Belton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When an arrest is made, it is reasonable for the arresting officer to search the person arrested in order to remove any weapons that the latter might seek to use in order to resist arrest or effect his escape. Otherwise, the officer’s safety might well be endangered, and the arrest itself frustrated. In addition, it is entirely reasonable for the arresting officer to search for and seize any evidence on the arrestee’s person in order to prevent its concealment or destruction. And the area into which an arrestee might reach in order to grab a weapon or evidentiary items must, of course, be governed by a like rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gant“warrantless search of the vehicle protection of the arresting officers and preservation of evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Gant
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.