Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 Ark. 1035 - Ahrens v. Moore

Ahrens v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1951
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roberts v. Anheuser Busch Brewing Ass'n · Cunningham v. C. R. Pease House Furnishing Co. · Kroger Grocery Baking Company v. Woods · Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Swilling · Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Gwilliams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule stated in this section requires the retail or wholesale dealer to utilize not only the special opportunities which he has to observe the condition of the goods, but also the special competence which he, as a dealer in such goods, should have to realize the dangerous implication of conditions which though observable by the customer are not likely to be appreciated by him. His failure to inform his vendees that the goods are or are likely to be dangerous is not excused by his ignorance thereof, if his ignorance is due to his failure to utilize his special opportunities and exercise his special competence for the purpose of discovering whether the goods are or are not safe for the use for which they are sold.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A vendor of a chattel manufactured by a third person is subject to liability * * * if, although he is ignorant of the dangerous character or condition of the chattel, he could have discovered it by exercising rea; sonable care to utilize the peculiar opportunity and' competence which as a dealer in such chattels he has or should have.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.