Martin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1961
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Van Hook v. Helena · Herring v. Bollinger · White v. State · Tharp v. State · Eveland v. State Use of Fossett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘ ‘ For reversal he has brought forward in his motion for a new trial fourteen assignments of error. While appellant, in his brief, argues but one alleged error— that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict — it becomes our duty, since appellant is charged with a felony, to consider all other alleged errors contained in the motion for a new trial, whether argued in appellant’s brief or not. Eveland v. State, use of Fossett, 189 Ark. 517 , 74 S. W. 2d 221 ; Van Hook v. Helena, 170 Ark. 1083 , 282 S.W. 673 ; Knighton v. State, 169 Ark. 293 , 274 S. W. 10 , and Babers v. State, 168 Ark. 1055 , 272 S.W. 659 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mode v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.