Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 Cal. 497 - In Re Gray

In Re Gray’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
5
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2005

18 state decisions

70192919301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Donaldson · State Board of Pharmacy v. . Matthews · State v. Childs · State v. Zotalis · 2 Smith & H. 476 - State v. Foutch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “those articles or preparations known as patent or proprietary medicines”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.