Hare v. Craig’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 1992
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schwerdtle v. County of Placer · Leverone v. Weakley · Hartley v. Vermillion · Lantz v. City of Los Angeles · Southern Pacific Co. v. City of Pomona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When the public or such portion of the public as had occasion to use a road has traveled over it for a period of more than five years with full knowledge of the owner, without asking or receiving permission to do so and without objection being made by anyone, a conclusive presumption of dedication to the public arises. (Hartley v. Vermillion, 141 Cal. 339 [ 74 Pac. 987 ] ; Lantz v. City of Los Angeles, 185 Cal. 262 [ 196 Pac. 481 ] ; Leverone v. Weakley, 155 Cal. 395 [ 101 Pac. 304 ] ; Southern Pac. Co. v. Pomona, 144 Cal. 339 [ 77 Pac. 929 ] ; Schwerdtle v. County of Placer, 108 Cal. 589 [ 41 Pac. 448 ].)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“which would interrupt the continuity of the adverse use....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.