Krassner v. Veneman’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6323 · 26 U.S.C. § 6337
Relies on Corbett v. Nutt · Sparks v. Farris · 21 Cal. 2d 781 - Sutter-Yuba Investment Co. v. Waste · Peterson v. Johnson · Quinn v. Kenney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To divest ownership, without personal notice and without direct compensation, is the instance in which a constitutional government approaches most nearly to an un restrained tyranny. Whatever tends to modify this right is favorable to the citizen, and ought to be liberally construed, on the principle that remedial statutes are to be beneficially expounded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Babb v. Frank
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.