Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 CALAPP3D 297 - Howard v. Lufkin

Howard v. Lufkin’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2017

14 state decisions

601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 22 Cal. 3d 865 - Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co. · Francis v. United States · 15 Cal. 3d 660 - Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. Rico · 26 Cal. 3d 515 - City of Berkeley v. Superior Court · 270 Cal. App. 2d 543 - Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Without discussion of the established rule, and in a statement superfluous to the opinion, the [C]ourt contradicted a long standing judicially created rule of civil procedure....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an order of denial of a motion to vacate under section 663 is appealable, notwithstanding that the same grounds could be urged on an appeal from the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`undermines its status as substantial authority'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.