Wright v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 41 Cal. 2d 193 - Brown v. Jensen · 7 Cal. 3d 603 - Spangler v. Memel · 157 Cal. App. 3d 511 - Budget Realty, Inc. v. Hunter · 128 Cal. App. 3d 615 - Shepherd v. Robinson · 179 Cal. App. 3d 230 - Roffinella v. Sherinian
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The vendor's sophistication or lack in a case such as this is irrelevant. To have a result depend on the seller's degree of sophistication is both unworkable and unsound.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.