State v. Hoeplinger’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
83 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Copas v. Commissioner of Correction (1995), State v. Atkinson (1996)
83 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Mendenhall · Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Custodial interrogation is questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way. Miranda v. Arizona, supra; see State v. Januszewski, 182 Conn. 142 , 158 , 438 A.2d 679 (1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3159 , 69 L.Ed. 1005 (1981).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A person is in custody only if a reasonable person would have believed he was not free to leave. . . . We must look at the totality of the circumstances of the testimony in order to determine whether a reasonable person would have construed those circumstances as placing him in a custody situation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.