In re Dunphy’s Empirical Analysis
206 F. 680 · 1913
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
January 1937
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on In re Seaholm · In re Carleton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The six years is measured backward from the date of the filing of the application for discharge, not from the hearing of the application by the court.” Syllabus.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Rubin““I cannot perceive how this language bears any construction other than that the six years is measured backward from the time of hearing.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Rubin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.