Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 F.1d 680 - In re Dunphy

In re Dunphy’s Empirical Analysis

206 F. 680 · 1913

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
January 1937
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on In re Seaholm · In re Carleton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The six years is measured backward from the date of the filing of the application for discharge, not from the hearing of the application by the court.” Syllabus.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““I cannot perceive how this language bears any construction other than that the six years is measured backward from the time of hearing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.