Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 F.2d 214 - Foundry Services, Inc. v. Beneflux Corp.

Foundry Services, Inc. v. Beneflux Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

206 F.2d 214 · 1953

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
February 2005
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently February 2005 · most notably Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. (1979), Blackwelder Furniture Co. of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Co. (1977)

42 federal appellate · 9 district ·

370195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parev Products Co. v. I. Rokeach & Sons, Inc. · American Mercury, Inc. v. Kiely · Behre v. Anchor Ins. · Æolian Co. v. Fischer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “: 38 That has always been included in its meaning; and I cannot see how the plaintiff will ever be able to prove what sales the defendant's competition will make it lose, to say nothing of the indirect, though at times far-reaching, effects upon its good will . . . . 39 Foundry Servs., Inc. v. Beneflux Corp., 206 F.2d 214 , 216 (2d Cir. 1952) (Hand, J., concurring) (emphasis added). V. 40 The last of the Airport criteria is:”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It serves to prevent the appellant from competing or from aiding others in competing with the appellee in the United States. The ordinary and natural result of such competition would be to dampen the sales of the appellee; but since any loss so caused could, if a wrong, be adequately redressed by money damages ascertainable upon proof, it does not constitute the irreparable injury necessary to justify an injunction pendente lito.” Foundry Services, Inc. v. Beneflux Corp., 206 F.2d 214, 216 (2d Cir. 1953).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““It is enough to notice that there is a substantial doubt about that and such an involved question is so bound up with the particular facts and circumstances that it is better first to let them be fully developed at a trial and findings made after that has been done.” Foundry Services, Inc., v. Beneflux Corporation, 2 Cir., 1953, 206 F.2d 214, 216 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.