Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 F.2d 435 - Robinson v. Bradshaw

Robinson v. Bradshaw’s Empirical Analysis

206 F.2d 435 · 1953

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
March 1981
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently March 1981 · most notably Wheatley v. Adler (1968), Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc. v. United States (1968)

36 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

2001953196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 901 · 33 U.S.C. § 920

Relies on O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc. · Cardillo US v. Liberty Mut Ins Co · Del Vecchio v. Bowers · Baltimore Philadelphia Steamboat Co v. Norton · Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Cardillo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In any proceeding for the enforcement of a claim for compensation under this chapter it shall be presumed, in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary (a) That the claim comes within the provisions of this chapter. . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. District of Columbia Workmen's Compensation Act. v. Frank Kelly, Inc. · Wolff v. Britton
  2. “that the `obligations or conditions' of employment [must] create the `zone of special danger' out of which the injury arose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Wolff v. Britton · Wolff v. Britton
  3. “did not arise out of and in the course of”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Dependents of Akamine v. Hawaiian Packing & Crating Co. · Wolff v. Britton

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.