Mincey v. Head’s Empirical Analysis
206 F.3d 1106 · 2000
Citation profile
68 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Batson v. Kentucky · United States v. Bagley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 161 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the [sentence] cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Meeks v. Moore · Chandler v. Moore“fell below an objective standard of reasonableness,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the deficient performance prejudiced the defense,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.