Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 F.3d 1175 - Sitka Sound Seafoods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Sitka Sound Seafoods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis

206 F.3d 1175 · 2000

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Commissioner v. Simmons (2011), Sherley v. Sebelius (2010)

25 federal appellate · 1 district ·

210200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. Tower Co. · Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board · Board of Regents of University of Washington v. Environmental Protection Agency · National Labor Relations Board v. Western Temporary Services, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to prevent this sort of sandbagging of appellees and respondents, we have generally held that issues not raised until the reply brief are waived”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he Board need not afford a party objecting to a representation hearing more than one opportunity to litigate any particular issue,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the relevant question is whether, quite apart from the [guidance], the Board acted unreasonably.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.