Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 F. Supp. 32 - Day v. Walker

206 F. Supp. 32 - Day v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 1970
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 15B (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 16 (§ 5 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 45 (§ 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914)

Relies on Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. · Momand v. Universal Film Exchanges, Inc. · Steiner v. 20th Century-Fox Film Corp. · Crummer Co. v. Ball du Pont · Asheville Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.