Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 F. Supp. 341 - Baker v. Carr

206 F. Supp. 341 - Baker v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
June 1996
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1996 · most notably Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado (1964), Ellis v. Mayor of Baltimore (1965)

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 9 state decisions

2301962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baker v. Carr · Kidd v. McCanless · 205 F. Supp. 248 - Toombs v. Fortson · 163 F. Supp. 184 - Magraw v. Donovan · Sims v. Frink

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We find no basis for holding that the Fourteenth Amendment precludes a state from enforcing a policy which would give a measure of protection and recognition to its less populous governmental units. These subdivisions constitute an integral and historic part of the state's governmental structure. They have real and substantial interests in the state's laws, and the state could reasonably conclude that its best interests would be subserved by their effective participation in state government and in the formulation of its laws and policies. The state has the right, if it sees fit, to assure that its smaller and less populous areas and communities are not completely overridden by sheer weight of numbers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “be under a clear and unmistakable duty to take such steps as will effectively accomplish the enforcement and vindication of the constitutional rights of the [relators].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.