Yaman v. D'ANGELO’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1448 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Mathews v. Eldridge · Ogbomon v. United States · Villager Pond, Inc. v. Town of Darien · Harris v. City of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the plaintiff's ability to pursue an Article 78 proceeding may provide him or her with all the process that is required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the alleged deprivation occurred as a result of established state procedures,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.