Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

206 Ga. 702

58 S.E.2d 383

Irwin v. LeCraw

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1950

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1950-03-14

Relies on Mauldin v. Mauldin · Chestnut v. Weekes · South Side Atlanta Bank v. Anderson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1950-03-14

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 1975 · most notably United States v. Williams (1971), Lynch v. State (1975)

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

200195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

¶1 Within ten days after the bill of exceptions has been signed and certified, the plaintiff therein must serve a copy thereof upon the opposite party or his counsel, with a return of such service or an acknowledgment of service entered upon or annexed to the bill of exceptions, in order to give this court jurisdiction. Code i 6-911; Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Moon, 80 Ga. 365 (10 S. E. 111); Inman, Smith & Co. v. Estes, 104 Ga. 645 (30 S. E. 800); Papworth v. Ryman, 108 Ga. 780 (33 S. E. 665); Izlar v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 162 Ga. 558 (134 S. E. 315); Warnock v. Woodward, 183 Ga. 367 (188 S. E. 336); South Side Atlanta Bank v. Anderson, 200 Ga. 322 (37 S. E. 2d, 404); Mauldin v. Mauldin, 203 Ga. 123 (45 S. E. 2d, 818). It appearing that there was no such service of the bill of exceptions on, nor legal waiver or acknowledgment of service by, one of the defendants in error, this was a fatal defect, and the motion to dismiss must be sustained.

¶2 Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Almand, J., who is disqualified.
/206/ga/702 · .json · Public domain