Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 Ga. App. 308 - Ramey v. State

206 Ga. App. 308 - Ramey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hicks v. State · Young v. State · 195 Ga. App. 56 - Mize v. Cleveland Express · 201 Ga. App. 537 - Pope v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The force or intimidation essential to robbery must either precede or be contemporaneous with, and not subsequent to, the taking. A relatively brief period of time between the use of the offensive weapon and the actual theft does not sever the connection between the two acts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “satisfies the statutory requirement that the taking be by use of an offensive weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to apply constructive force to intimidate the victim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.