Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 Ga. App. 423 - Roberts v. Roberts

206 Ga. App. 423 - Roberts v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2018

7 state decisions

40199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Georgia Power Co. v. Leonard · 186 Ga. App. 27 - National Consultants, Inc. v. Burt · Schiselman v. Trust Co. Bank · Department of Transportation v. McCollum · Jakobsen v. Colonial Pipeline Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defenses to a civil contempt are that the order was not sufficiently definite and certain, was not violated, or that the violation was not wilful.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “nothing in the trial court's order reflects it is other than a final judgment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.