Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 Ill. App. 3d 719 - Adams v. Ward

206 Ill. App. 3d 719 - Adams v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 257 Ill. App. 3d 354 - Zuaznabar v. Board of Review of the Department of Employment Security (1993), 299 Ill. App. 3d 446 - Greenlaw v. Department of Employment Security (1998)

30 state decisions

260199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 105 Ill. 2d 501 - Jackson v. Board of Review of the Department of Labor · 62 Ill. App. 3d 671 - ABC Trans National Transport, Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc. · 125 Ill. App. 3d 376 - Gregory v. Bernardi · 144 Ill. App. 3d 575 - Popoff v. Department of Labor · 125 Ill. App. 3d 1021 - Flex v. Department of Labor, Board of Review

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"the deliberate and willful violation of a reasonable rule or policy of the employing unit, governing the individual’s behavior in performance of his work, provided such violation has harmed the employing unit or other employees or has been repeated by the individual despite a warning or other explicit instruction from the employing unit.” Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 48, par. 432(A).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.