Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 Ind. 151 - Sachs v. Blewett

Sachs v. Blewett’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
4
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Appel v. Hupfield (2001), Scott v. Bodor, Inc. (1991)

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 39 state decisions

230193319401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bethell v. Bethell · Burt v. Bowles · Balue v. Taylor · Basye v. Basye · Horner v. McConnell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “actionable fraud cannot be predicated upon a promise to do a thing in the future, although there may be no intention of fulfilling the promise.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Fraud cannot be predicated upon acts which the party charged has a right by law to do nor upon the non-performance of acts which by law he is not bound to do, whatever may be his motive, design or purpose, either in doing or not doing the acts complained of.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““If the complaint can be upheld, it must be upon the theory that where a contract is entered into with the intention of not carrying it out, an action will lie in tort for fraud because of the intention not to carry out the contract, independent of and in addition to any action that may lie upon the contract or for its breach.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.