Tuscano v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2005 · most notably State v. Lackey (2005), 2 Kan. App. 2d 481 - Schoonover v. State (1978)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Minor · State v. Taylor · Ware v. State · Cunningham v. Hoffman · Allen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is only where constitutional rights have been impaired that trial errors may be considered in a 60-1507 action, and then only where exceptional circumstances are found to exist.” (p. 263.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jamerson v. State“[a] judgment may be rendered pursuant to this section only after the court finds from competent evidence the fact of former convictions for felony....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.