State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
March 1980
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gordon v. United States · In re Ruffalo · State v. Zimmer · State v. Sagebiel · State v. Hill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . As a general rule, physical objects connected with, or which serve to unfold or explain a criminal act are admissible. The weight and value of such evidence, however, is a matter for assessment by the jury. (State v. Joseph Little, 201 Kan. 101 , 439 P. 2d 383 ; State v. Hill, 193 Kan. 512 , 394 P. 2d 106 .)” (p. 389.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Steward
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.