Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

206 La. 579

19 So.2d 258

State v. Beamish.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 14, 1944

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1944-07-14

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1976

2 state decisions

Relies on Blaize v. Hayes

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1944-07-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 The petition of Mrs. Mervin Sidney Beamish, defendant-relatrix, who is applying for a rehearing, cannot be considered.

¶2 It is provided in Section 5 of Rule XII of the Rules of this Court, 191 La. xliv, that an application for a rehearing will not be considered in a case where the Court has refused to- grant a writ of certiorari or other supervisory writ or rule nisi. The rule of court is applicable in all cases, even when the reason given by this Court for refusing to grant a supervisory writ or rule nisi is that the judgment or order complained of is correct, and even when this Court renders an opinion explaining why the judgment or ruling complained of is *581 correct. Blaize v. Hayes, 204 La. 298, 15 So.2d 228.

¶3 For the reasons assigned, the application for a rehearing is denied.

/206/la/579 · .json · Public domain