Gillespie v. Gillespie’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rohrbeck v. Rohrbeck · Taylor v. Taylor · Petrini v. Petrini · 109 Md. App. 1 - Wagner v. Wagner · Bernadyn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he [trial] court was permitted to admit the Lish Report because Dr. Snyder considered it in reaching her opinions and conclusions, even though the Lish Report contained otherwise inadmissible hearsay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lamalfa v. Hearn“moved to have the Lish Report ... admitted into evidence. Mother objected to the admission of the Lish Report[.] ... Thereafter, the court admitted the Lish Report ... into evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lamalfa v. Hearn“testified that she had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, and her testimony regarding her bipolar diagnosis was properly admitted as substantive evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lamalfa v. Hearn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.