State v. Holt’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Whren v. United States · Brown v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“assuming [that] the stop was not supported by articulable reasonable suspicion, any new crimes committed by [the defendant] immediately following the stop, such as possessing, raising and pointing the firearm at [one detective] and accelerating his vehicle towards [another detective] purged the taint of the unlawful stop[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[N]otwithstanding a strong causal connection in fact between lawless police conduct and a defendant's response, if the defendant's response is itself a new, distinct crime, then the police constitutionally may arrest the defendant for that crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a new crime committed by a defendant after an illegal search or seizure is a sufficient intervening circumstance that can attenuate the taint of an illegal search or seizure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.