Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 MICH 576 - Parkyn v. Ford

Parkyn v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1942
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1942

4 state decisions

201919192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. . Stephens · Nounnan v. Sutter County Land Co. · St. John v. Hendrickson · Draft v. Hesselsweet · Sweetman v. . Prince

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The trial court interrogated counsel to some extent as to the identity of the causes of action, and this was done for the purpose of shortening the trial and avoiding a long record. The trial court is to be commended for his effort in that direction. We are of the opinion that the verdict was properly directed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.