State v. Cohoon’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2019
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is the fraudulent conversion of property by one who has lawfully acquired possession of it for the use and benefit of the owner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that such act was done with a fraudulent purpose or corrupt intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“mere act of converting or appropriating property to one's own use.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.