206 N.C. App. 239 - State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Powell · 186 N.C. App. 57 - State v. Smith · Henry v. Deen · State v. Ward · State v. Cummings
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendant... cites no authority that precludes the district attorney from proceeding on a common law charge when a potentially applicable statutory charge is barred by the statute of limitations or could result in a lesser sentence. . . . [P]ursuant to Article IV, Section 18 of our Constitution, “ ‘the responsibility and authority to prosecute all criminal actions in the superior courts is vested solely in the several District Attorneys of the State.’ ” That authority includes “[t]he ability to be selective in determining what cases to prosecute and what charges to bring against a particular defendant[.]” The district attorney, in this case, was entitled to elect to proceed under the common law rather than under the campaign finance statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Obstruction of justice is .... any act which prevents, obstructs, impedes or hinders public or legal justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.