¶1 Order affirmed, with costs; second question certified answered in the negative; first question not answered because it presents a question of fact and not of law; no opinion.
206 N.Y. 657
99 N.E 1105
Coykendall v. . Harrison
Decided June 29, 1912
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1912-06-29
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 15, 1912, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting an injunction to restrain the defendants from carrying out a contract for the purchase of filters and purifying devices. The following questions were certified: “ 1.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1913
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1912-06-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →