Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

206 Or. App. 766

Barham v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 12, 2006

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 2006-07-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2018

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-07-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM

¶1Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, arguing that the board erred (1) in determining that claimant’s occupational classification is that of a “contractor” rather than that of an “excavator/ backhoe operator”; and (2) in reducing claimant’s partial disability award for his left shoulder from 20 percent to 12 percent instead of 14 percent. The board’s determination of claimant’s occupational classification is supported by substantial evidence. SAIF concedes that the board made a scrivener’s error in reducing the award from 20 percent to 12 percent and that the award should have been reduced to 14 percent. We agree and accept SAIF’s concession; accordingly, we reverse the order and remand for entry of a corrected order awarding claimant 14 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability for his left shoulder.

¶2Order reversed and remanded for entry of corrected order awarding claimant 14 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability; otherwise affirmed.

/206/orapp/766 · .json · Public domain