¶1The six judges who heard the argument of this appeal being equally divided in opinion, the judgment of sentence of the court below is affirmed and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.
206 Pa. Super. 725
Commonwealth v. Gaspero
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 9, 1965
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1965-09-09
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1966
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1965-09-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →