Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 SO2D 25 - Steinhauer v. State

Steinhauer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
6
states following
April 1975
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Gault · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Kent v. United States · Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. Shott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We interpret what was said in Gault and Kent, when read together, to mean that the basic requirements of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment require assistance of counsel whether it results in a transfer order or a commitment order. The purpose for creating juvenile courts was not to deprive a juvenile of his rights but to ameliorate the harshness of the criminal law." Id. 206 So.2d at 27 . "Therefore, we feel that the ruling in Gault must apply to cases both prospectively and retroactively." Id. 206 So.2d at 27-28 . (Emphasis added)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The critical question presented upon this appeal is whether a 16-year-old boy is entitled to counsel in the Juvenile Court at a hearing where he waives the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court." Steinhauer v. State, 206 So.2d 25, 26 (3d Dist.Ct.App.Fla. 1968).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.