Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 SO2D 377 - Brown v. State

Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

411
cited by 411 later decisions
8
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 404 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 411 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 163 Ill. 2d 93 - People v. Novak (1994), 403 So. 2d 956 - Ray v. State (1981)

3 federal appellate · 404 state decisions

1560196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 124 So. 2d 481 - Brown v. State · Tyus v. Apalachicola Northern Railroad Company · Jimenez v. State · 199 So. 2d 100 - State v. Cole · 198 So. 2d 313 - Flagler v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 411 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e are confronted by the organic requirement that the accusatory pleading apprise the defendant of all offenses of which he may be convicted.”
    27 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) Crimes divisible into degrees. (2) Attempts to commit offenses. (3) Offenses necessarily included in the offense charged. (4) Offenses which may or may not be included in the offense charged, depending on the accusatory pleading and the evidence.”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the burden of proof of the major crime cannot be discharged, without proving the lesser crime as an essential link in the chain of evidence.”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.