¶1In re: William Asa Sharp applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First ’Circuit', Parish of East Baton Rouge. 205 So.2d 116.
¶2Writ refused. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is correct.
206 So. 2d 95
Decided February 2, 1968
Relies on Sharp v. Sharp
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1968-02-02
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1994
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1In re: William Asa Sharp applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First ’Circuit', Parish of East Baton Rouge. 205 So.2d 116.
¶2Writ refused. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is correct.