Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

206 So. 3d 167

Huff v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 14, 2016

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2016-12-14

Decided 2016-12-14

PER CURIAM,

¶1We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of Huffs motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal *168Procedure 3.850. In Issue VI of his pro se brief on appeal, however, Huff appears to argue that, upon revocation of his probation in case no. 12-CF-004128, the trial court imposed an illegal sentence on count one because of a scoresheet error. Huff did not preserve this issue for review. Accordingly, our affirmance is without prejudice to Huffs right to file a legally sufficient motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

¶2Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
/206/so3d/167 · .json · Public domain