Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 So. 3d 219 - State v. Murphy

206 So. 3d 219 - State v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Berger v. United States · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants · Bauer v. Waldschmidt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prosecutorial misconduct must be so pronounced and persistent that it casts serious doubts upon the correctness of the jury's verdict. The reviewing court should accord credit to the good sense and fair-mindedness of the jury that heard the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “the touchstone of due process analysis in cases of alleged prosecutorial misconduct is the fairness of the trial, not the culpability of the prosecutor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “on a social network chat site called 'Kik'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.