Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 So. 3d 990 - State v. Copelin

206 So. 3d 990 - State v. Copelin’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Arizona v. Fulminante · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Old Chief v. United States · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] reviewing court should consider the importance of the evidence to the State's case, the presence or absence of additional corroboration of the evidence, and the overall strength of the State's case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[c]onsidering the strength of the evidence the State presented at trial against Mr. Copelin, we cannot conclude the jury verdict was attributable to the error of admitting the other crimes evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.