Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 SW3D 657 - Kniatt v. State

Kniatt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

57 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco))

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Brady v. United States · McCarthy v. United States · Blackledge v. Allison · Ex Parte Peterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to be consistent with due process of law, must be entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. To be “voluntary,” a guilty plea must be the expression of the defendant’s own free will and must not be induced by threats, misrepresentations, or improper promises. A defendant’s sworn representation that his guilty plea is voluntary “constitute^] a formidable barrier in any subsequent collateral proceedings.” An applicant seeking habeas corpus relief on the basis of an involuntary guilty plea must prove his claim by a preponderance of the evidence. An applicant’s delay in seeking habeas corpus relief may prejudice the credibility of his claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An appellate court reviewing a trial court's ruling on a habeas claim must review the record evidence in the light most favorable to the trial court's ruling and must uphold that ruling absent an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “appellant, by revoking his bond, for his decisions to renege on the plea bargain and replace his counsel). [4] One of the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.