Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 U.S. 358 - Romeu v. Todd

Romeu v. Todd’s Empirical Analysis

206 U.S. 358 · 1907

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
14
cited 14 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 26 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions (14 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1997 · most notably Palmore v. United States (1973), O'Donoghue v. United States (1933)

9 federal appellate · 26 district · 1 state decisions

1901907191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kirby v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad · Smith v. Gale · United States of America v. Bitter Root Development Company · Mellen v. Moline Malleable Iron Works · County of Warren v. Marcy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As ibis is a proceeding on the equity side of tho court, it is governed by the principles of equity followed by the federal courts as distinguished from suits at law where local statutes are adopted. As local laws have no binding force upon the United States courts in matters of procedure in equity and maritime law, the laws of Porto Rico relating to the filing of notice of lis pendens have therefore no application in this case, and the sufficiency of this bill must be determined by the rules and principles followed in like proceedings in the courts of the United States.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.