Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 VA 848 - Bare v. Jones

Bare v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1994
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1994

6 state decisions

201966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weddle, Administratrix v. Draper · Spurlin, Administratrix v. Richardson · Arnold v. Wood · Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Heath · Murphy v. J. L. Saunders, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he party who affirms negligence must establish it by proof sufficient to satisfy reasonable and well balanced minds. The evidence must show more than a probability of a negligent act. An inference cannot be drawn from a presumption, but must be founded upon some fact legally established. This court has repeatedly held that when liability depends upon carelessness or fault of a person, or his agents, the right of recovery depends upon the same being shown by competent evidence, and it is incumbent upon such a plaintiff to furnish evidence to show how and why the accident occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The court instructs the jury: That where the plaintiff calls the defendant as an adverse witness, while he or she is not bound by such of the defendant’s testimony as may be in conflict with the evidence introduced on behalf of the plaintiff, the plaintiff is bound by so much of the clear, logical testimony of the defendant as is reasonable and uncontradicted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.