206 Wis. 2d 309 - Abbyland Processing v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2015
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pullman-Standard v. Swint · United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans · 201 Wis. 2d 274 - UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission · Galloway v. General Motors Service Parts Operations · 39 Wis. 2d 653 - Robertson Transportation Co. v. Public Service Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In his complaint, [Bowen] alleged that he was subjected to daily sexual harassment over a five-month period, from January through May of 2002. This alleged daily sexual harassment occurred prior to the limitations period and, evidently, ended when [Bowen] was moved to a different shift. [Bowen] did not allege further instances of harassment thereafter, with the exception of one discrete episode, the pink donut incident, which took place in January of 2003. While ongoing harassment beginning prior to and extending into the limitations period may be considered a continuing violation, in this case there was no allegation that the January through May incidents were part of a continuing course of conduct. Further, the sole instance of harassment which is claimed to have occurred within 300 days of the filing of the complaint-the offering of a pink donut to [Bowen]was a matter so subtle and ambiguous that the commission cannot be certain it was based on [Bowen]'s sexual orientation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“repeated comments that her husband [was] earning enough”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“acknowledgement of the discriminatory reasons for [Forster's] salary level [was] sufficient evidence of the discriminatory salary paid Forster within the statute of limitations period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.