Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 206 W. Va. 300 - State v. Williams

206 W. Va. 300 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Patton v. Yount · 194 W. Va. 657 - State v. Guthrie · 197 W. Va. 588 - State v. Miller · 167 W. Va. 252 - State v. Payne · 200 W. Va. 280 - State v. Hinkle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the State’s case is based upon the uncorroborated and uncontradicted identification testimony of a prosecuting witness, it is error not to instruct the jury upon request that, if they believe from the evidence in the case that the crime charged against the defendant rests alone on the testimony of the prosecuting witness, then the jury should scrutinize such testimony with care and caution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.