State ex rel. Huffman v. Stephens’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 195 W. Va. 121 - State Ex Rel. Riffle v. Ranson · 184 W. Va. 227 - Ellis v. King · 178 W. Va. 161 - Kidwell v. Westinghouse Electric Co. · Brent v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, ETC. · 163 W. Va. 390 - Brent v. Board of Trustees of David & Elkins College
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether a corporation is subject to venue in a given county in this State under the phrase in W. Va.Code, 56 — 1—1(b), "wherein it does business" depends upon the sufficiency of the corporation's minimum contacts in such county that demonstrate it is doing business ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the issue of venue [has] the potential of placing a litigant at an unwarranted disadvantage in a pending action and [] relief by appeal would be inadequate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to resolve the issue of where venue for a civil action lies,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.